Erratum Mechanics, hydrodynamics and energetics of blue whale lunge feeding: efficiency dependence on krill density

نویسندگان

  • J. A. Goldbogen
  • J. Calambokidis
  • E. Oleson
  • J. Potvin
  • N. D. Pyenson
  • G. Schorr
  • R. E. Shadwick
چکیده

In the first line of the 'Kinematics of diving and lunge feeding' section of the Results (p. 134), the number of blue whales that were tagged was incorrectly given as 265 – the correct number is 25. In Fig.A1 (p. 142), two mistakes were introduced. In the 'Energy in' column, krill energy density should have been given as 4600kJkg –1 (rather than 4600kJg –1). Also in the 'Energy in' column, the units were missing from the 'Energy obtained from ingested krill'; this should have read 'Energy obtained from ingested krill  4,868,640 kJ'. The correct version of the figure is shown below. Volume engulfed per lunge = 80 m 3 Total volume filtered per dive = 280 m 3 Number of lunges per dive = 3.5 Krill density = 4.5 kg m –3 Amount of krill obtained from lunges = 1260 kg Energy within ingested krill = 5,796,000 kJ Krill energy density = 4600 kJ kg –1 Energy obtained from ingested krill = 4,868,640 kJ Assimilation efficiency = 84% Mechanical energy required for one lunge = 945 kJ Mechanical energy required for all lunges = 3308 kJ Number of lunges per dive = 3.5 Metabolic energy required for all lunges = 22,053 kJ Metabolic energy cost of the foraging dive = 63,456 kJ Combined efficiency (0.15) Active metabolic rate (AMR) for dive and surface time = 41,403 kJ Energy in Energy out Shape and engulfment drag = 569 kJ Pre-engulfment acceleration = 376 kJ Efficiency = 77 699 Erratum In Table 3, the data from the 'Net energy gain' column were inadvertently repeated in the 'Energy loss, total' column. The correct version of Table 3, with the original data for the 'Energy loss, total' column, is shown below. We apologise sincerely to authors and readers for any inconvenience these errors may have caused. Table 3. Effects of prey density on the efficiency of blue whale foraging dives Krill density (kg m –3) Body length (m) Body mass (kg) Volume filtered, total (m 3) Krill obtained (kg) Gross energy gain (kJ) Energy loss, lunge (kJ) Energy loss, diving (kJ) Energy loss, total (kJ) Net energy gain (kJ) Efficiency, dive 0. All calculations correspond to foraging dives that average 200 m deep and a lunge frequency of 3.5 lunges per dive; dive duration was 9.8 min followed by a surface recovery period of 2.7 min, as determined from tag data (Table 1). …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Mechanics, hydrodynamics and energetics of blue whale lunge feeding: efficiency dependence on krill density.

Lunge feeding by rorqual whales (Balaenopteridae) is associated with a high energetic cost that decreases diving capacity, thereby limiting access to dense prey patches at depth. Despite this cost, rorquals exhibit high rates of lipid deposition and extremely large maximum body size. To address this paradox, we integrated kinematic data from digital tags with unsteady hydrodynamic models to est...

متن کامل

Kinematic Diversity in Rorqual Whale Feeding Mechanisms

Rorqual whales exhibit an extreme lunge filter-feeding strategy characterized by acceleration to high speed and engulfment of a large volume of prey-laden water [1-4]. Although tagging studies have quantified the kinematics of lunge feeding, the timing of engulfment relative to body acceleration has been modeled conflictingly because it could never be directly measured [5-7]. The temporal coord...

متن کامل

Underwater acrobatics by the world's largest predator: 360° rolling manoeuvres by lunge-feeding blue whales.

The extreme body size of blue whales requires a high energy intake and therefore demands efficient foraging strategies. As an obligate lunge feeder on aggregations of small zooplankton, blue whales engulf a large volume of prey-laden water in a single, rapid gulp. The efficiency of this feeding mechanism is strongly dependent on the amount of prey that can be captured during each lunge, yet foo...

متن کامل

Feeding rates and under-ice foraging strategies of the smallest lunge filter feeder, the Antarctic minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis).

Body size and feeding mode are two fundamental characteristics that determine foraging performance and ecological niche. As the smallest obligate lunge filter feeders, minke whales represent an ideal system for studying the physical and energetic limits of filter feeding in endotherms. We used multi-sensor suction cup tags to quantify the feeding performance of Antarctic minke whales. Foraging ...

متن کامل

Passive versus active engulfment: verdict from trajectory simulations of lunge-feeding fin whales Balaenoptera physalus.

Lunge-feeding in rorqual whales represents the largest biomechanical event on Earth and one of the most extreme feeding methods among aquatic vertebrates. By accelerating to high speeds and by opening their mouth to large gape angles, these whales generate the water pressure required to expand their mouth around a large volume of prey-laden water. Such large influx is facilitated by highly exte...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010